Identifying "Leaders"

A layman inside any particular boundary who craves for the betterment and prosperity in that particular area without any greed of public fund is the true citizen of the country. The groups of those laymen optimistic towards the future of country are worthwhile for the greatest respect. The respect is given by the public itself and they will stand and reflect themselves as each and every citizen of the country. They plan and organize the activities so well and they are less likely to be engulfed by the wealth of the country. Yes! they are “Leaders”. The short definition might not be enough but that definitely is not the wrong one.

The citizens at a position to lead the country are often misguided by their own ideology. They don’t feel like citizens but they start believing themselves as a ruler who can utilize power given to them in the way of filthiness. They will become mate of their own selfish side and drowned totally into corruption. They are “Corrupted Leaders”.

Yes both are leaders but one group inspect the country properly and other group need an inspection from the people. Especially in this century, people need to develop and culture there moral values as well as understand how the country is governed. Most of the corrupted minds in the world were the influential leader but finally the real leader will be the one who put his or her moral values into the top rather than personal greed. Serving the country should be transparent, plan oriented and through co-operation indeed.