Pseudo Democracy

The rights and equality of peoples and development of every sector is the main priority of governing body of any country. To ensure the rights of people and to discard autocracy by abolishing tyranny, many countries in the world had gone through their own level of struggle. In some countries the people’s voice was portrayed in the law and rule of law was efficient whereas in some countries, political chaos and dispute was the outcome. But most of the countries now are practicing democracy. The people’s agendas, duties are represented in the law of the respective countries.


Nepal is practicing the federal republic democracy for the first time in our history. Recently, the promulgation of the constitution in Nepal by more than two third constitution assembly members shows the mutual understanding between the parties (though they have prioritized various agendas) to end the transition phase of the country followed by the effect of recent big earthquake. In that sense, the move taken to promulgate the constitution was applauded by many people within the country and also from the international communities as well. But, the recent conflict in terai region of Nepal has left the people be saddened and desperate as the madhesh based leaders are leading the strike. They are discarding the constitution as they feel that it doesn’t guarantee the true agendas of the people living in madhesh. Another interesting fact is that Madhesh based leaders are taking themselves as the representatives of the whole area of terai despite of the real calculation of their true supporters in numerical basis.


On the other hand, the big III parties are ensuring the inclusion of the agendas of Madhesh as well as every marginalized group in the constitution. They are also focusing to include true agendas by the amendments and via various commissions.  But, this unrest within the country had also aroused so many Indo-Nepal issues (blockade of boarder and other diplomatic issues) recently and soon becoming the concerns in an International level.


Series of question arises that is all about the health and true aspirations of democracy and its implementation in Nepal. Are we ready to practice the methodology, core values and norms of democracy? Are we ready to listen to the voice of every people and search the common mandate to address it via governing bodies? Are we mature enough to handle any hardships that come into our way while implementing the laws?  And off course an important question is, What about the procedures of democracy that we have adopted till now? Are they correct?


Let’s not figure out and advocate weather the procedures of democratic principles that are adopted in the country are correct or not as we are already became successful to some extent. But, the background of the democracy shouldn’t be forgotten if we are calling ourselves a democratic country.  The election is one of the main procedures of democracy. We have promulgated the constitution by this method that includes the people’s participation which is really a healthy practice.

The madhesi leaders stood against this fundamental procedure of election and went to protest. Again we also should understand the Maoist agitation in the past years during their ten years of revolution was also an undemocratic way to address the rights of the people. Many revolutions and reforms in the past had established some changes and ensured the rights and equity of citizens in the country but the rule of law and order has not been maintained. Still there is conflict and people are getting killed in order to ensure the fundamental rights to the people. So, provision of addressing every group either minority or indigenous should be in a healthy way and without bloodshed. Those laws should be included in the constitution and strict implementation of the laws regarding violence is the way of ending the dispute and chaos prevailing in the country. 

The strengthening of the constitution by the peaceful talks by government with the agitated groups in terai could be the solution. Also, the healthy practice of the opposition parties in parliament shouldn’t be unconstitutional and undemocratic in coming days.
 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Identifying "Leaders"